MB Madaera
Lost 31.7 lbs fat
Built 11.7 lbs muscle


Chris Madaera
Built 9 lbs muscle


Keelan Parham
Lost 30 lbs fat
Built 4 lbs muscle


Bob Marchesello
Lost 23.55 lbs fat
Built 8.55 lbs muscle


Jeff Turner
Lost 25.5 lbs fat


Jeanenne Darden
Lost 26 lbs fat
Built 3 lbs muscle


Ted Tucker
Lost 41 lbs fat
Built 4 lbs muscle

 
 

Determine the Length of Your Workouts

Evaluate Your Progress

Keep Warm-Up in Perspective


ARCHIVES >>

"Doing more exercise with less intensity,"
Arthur Jones believes, "has all but
destroyed the actual great value
of weight training. Something
must be done . . . and quickly."
The New Bodybuilding for
Old-School Results supplies
MUCH of that "something."

 

This is one of 93 photos of Andy McCutcheon that are used in The New High-Intensity Training to illustrate the recommended exercises.

To find out more about McCutcheon and his training, click here.

 

Mission Statement

H.I.T. Acceptable Use Policy

Privacy Policy

Credits

LOG IN FORUM MAIN REGISTER SEARCH
We're Wimps Compared To...
1 | 2 | Next | Last
Author
Rating
Options

BennyAnthonyOfKC

Missouri, USA

Lasha Pataraya lifting 194-pounds with his ears, and THE GUINESS BOOK OF WORLD RECORDS declared that... he now has the longest ear-lobes... I mean, heaviest lifting record with his ears!

Currently, I am designing THE H.I.T. SUB-PROTOCOL FOR THE EARS! I should be ready to publish it in... NOT!
Open User Options Menu

BennyAnthonyOfKC

Missouri, USA



I found this, although the photograph lacked a caption. While the bodybuilder looks too big to be real, GREGG VALENTINE (THE MAN WHOS ARMS EXPLODED) always looked unreal too. Can anyone confirm, or deny, if the attached photograph is real, or photo-shopped?

(I almost tend to say that it is real, because of the shadows, except that is the right kind of touch that someone would want to add in order to make it more believable.)




SOURCES:

http://www.omero.it/...218-gregval.jpg

http://www.youtube.com/...h?v=HEHxCAR2suM


Open User Options Menu

markh

I think the photo is real but it looks like he`s "wearing" an inflatible "muscle suit" or has been loading up with synthol (less likely as the synthol look tends to distort the muscles more)

Mark H
BennyAnthonyOfKC wrote:


I found this, although the photograph lacked a caption. While the bodybuilder looks too big to be real, GREGG VALENTINE (THE MAN WHOS ARMS EXPLODED) always looked unreal too. Can anyone confirm, or deny, if the attached photograph is real, or photo-shopped?

(I almost tend to say that it is real, because of the shadows, except that is the right kind of touch that someone would want to add in order to make it more believable.)




SOURCES:

http://www.omero.it/...218-gregval.jpg

http://www.youtube.com/...h?v=HEHxCAR2suM




Open User Options Menu

Ciccio

Clearly photoshopped!

Benny,
why stop at the ears? I remember there's this picture of an indian yogi lifting a big rock with his dick floating around the net... ;)

Franco
Open User Options Menu

BennyAnthonyOfKC

Missouri, USA



Franco,

Minchia! Ouch, I do not even want to think about that type of lifting! :)


markh,

About the synthol, this is what was on my mind and it is why I mentioned GREGG VALENTINE, because wasnt he the synthol-king!?
Open User Options Menu

markh

Benny,
yes Valentine was certainly it`s best known proponent. That photo looks more like a "cartoon" bodybuilder than a "synthol" one though. I would expect more lumps and bumps with synthol rather than this fairly symmetrical but way over the top physique shown in this photograph

Mark H
Open User Options Menu

Tony Williams

In case someone wants to see him and hasn't, it is Gregg Valentino, not Valentine.

To see him, is almost to disbelieve him.

Imagine arms about the size of a teenager's waist.

Tony
Open User Options Menu

backtrack

But if you ever watch any videos of valentino on youtube with him in them. He says he was injecting a lot of testosterone locally into his arms and at one point injecting thousands of milligrams of testosterone on a weekly basis, so I am still not so sure...Perhaps he would rather be seen as massive user of steroids rather than a massive user of oil that does absolutely nothing other than make the area targeted look much larger.

Dan
Open User Options Menu

Tony Williams

Dan_The_man wrote:
But if you ever watch any videos of valentino on youtube with him in them. He says he was injecting a lot of testosterone locally into his arms and at one point injecting thousands of milligrams of testosterone on a weekly basis, so I am still not so sure...Perhaps he would rather be seen as massive user of steroids rather than a massive user of oil that does absolutely nothing other than make the area targeted look much larger.

Dan


Yes, he admitted using oil and steroids.

Later he lost his gym and his freedom when he was sentenced to prison for dealing drugs.

Doing what he did to his body was nuts.

The irony: He had a great physique as a teen.

He obviously had body dysmorphia.

Tony
Open User Options Menu

jastrain

obama would break this record with no problem--he could lift a stack of 1000lbplates with his ears--obamas ears are huge--perot [per-row sp?] would be a close second to obama. tyson would definitely would not go back for "seconds" if-n he were to fight obama
Open User Options Menu

BennyAnthonyOfKC

Missouri, USA




Bravo jastrain! :)
Open User Options Menu

entsminger

Virginia, USA

==Scott==
Yes we are a bunch of wimps. Compare the average man today with the barefoot and mostly starved Confederate soldiers during the Civil War who for years marched 30 miles to one battle after another, fought hard in those battles,dug trench after trench got shot up and injured and sick and continued on for more untill they dropped.The toughest HIT program would be child's play for them.
Open User Options Menu

BennyAnthonyOfKC

Missouri, USA

Entsminger,

You hold a disdain for Rush Limbaugh, but you empathize with CONFEDERATE SOLDIERS? Should you not have written about the hardships of UNION SOLDIERS? And, what happened to this forum being about muscle-building? :)

(By the way, the Limbaugh family were Union-sympathizers, as Civil War was (more or less) Republicans for the North & Democrats for The South.)
Open User Options Menu

entsminger

Virginia, USA

BennyAnthonyOfKC wrote:
Entsminger,

You hold a disdain for Rush Limbaugh, but you empathize with CONFEDERATE SOLDIERS? Should you not have written about the hardships of UNION SOLDIERS? And, what happened to this forum being about muscle-building? :)

(By the way, the Limbaugh family were Union-sympathizers, as Civil War was (more or less) Republicans for the North & Democrats for The South.)



Rush Limbaugh and the Beck club have nothing in common with the real Confederacy and what it stood for. This relates to the forum because you were talking about wimps and I say anyone on here doing HIT is a wimp compared to the men of old and the trials and tribulation they had to go through.The biggest trial or tribulation for Rush is finding a belt large enough to go around his waist.
Open User Options Menu

Tony Williams

entsminger wrote:
BennyAnthonyOfKC wrote:
Entsminger,

You hold a disdain for Rush Limbaugh, but you empathize with CONFEDERATE SOLDIERS? Should you not have written about the hardships of UNION SOLDIERS? And, what happened to this forum being about muscle-building? :)

(By the way, the Limbaugh family were Union-sympathizers, as Civil War was (more or less) Republicans for the North & Democrats for The South.)


Rush Limbaugh and the Beck club have nothing in common with the real Confederacy and what it stood for. This relates to the forum because you were talking about wimps and I say anyone on here doing HIT is a wimp compared to the men of old and the trials and tribulation they had to go through.The biggest trial or tribulation for Rush is finding a belt large enough to go around his waist.


Let's make this simple:

My father grew up and worked on a farm. Hard, difficult manual labor in the 1930's during the Great Depression.

He fought in the Battle of the Budge (I know, look it up) in WWII. He was injured in battle and use of his left hand was severely restricted.

I do HIT.

But I am a wimp compared to him.

Tony

Open User Options Menu

entsminger

Virginia, USA

Tony Williams wrote:
entsminger wrote:
BennyAnthonyOfKC wrote:
Entsminger,

You hold a disdain for Rush Limbaugh, but you empathize with CONFEDERATE SOLDIERS? Should you not have written about the hardships of UNION SOLDIERS? And, what happened to this forum being about muscle-building? :)

(By the way, the Limbaugh family were Union-sympathizers, as Civil War was (more or less) Republicans for the North & Democrats for The South.)


Rush Limbaugh and the Beck club have nothing in common with the real Confederacy and what it stood for. This relates to the forum because you were talking about wimps and I say anyone on here doing HIT is a wimp compared to the men of old and the trials and tribulation they had to go through.The biggest trial or tribulation for Rush is finding a belt large enough to go around his waist.


Let's make this simple:

My father grew up and worked on a farm. Hard, difficult manual labor in the 1930's during the Great Depression.

He fought in the Battle of the Budge (I know, look it up) in WWII. He was injured in battle and use of his left hand was severely restricted.

I do HIT.

But I am a wimp compared to him.

Tony



==Scott==
Exactly my point.
Open User Options Menu

BennyAnthonyOfKC

Missouri, USA



Entsminger,


THE CONFEDERACY were wimps in the sense that anyone stood for what they did, GOT WHAT THEY DESERVED, and it's too bad that THE RADICAL REPUBLICANS did not get their ultimate wish, because there would have never been a reason for THE CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT simply because THE NATHAN BEDFORD FORRESTs all would have swung from gallows. By the way, what "THE REAL CONFEDERACY stood for" was always SLAVERY, because it was written into their constitution, and if it was not for guys like Glenn Beck & the historians on his shows, the tidbit that SLAVERY was mentioned in the very founding documents of THE CONFEDERACY, people could generally go on believing that they stood for STATES RIGHTS, because THE U.S. CONSTITUTION & THE UNION was no better, which is absolutely false, as the word slavery itself NEVER appeared in THE U.S. CONSTITUTION by design, until THE 13th AMENDMENT became law, thanks to REPUBLICANS, the heroes, the real heroes, that stood by blacks to end slavery.


Open User Options Menu

Tony Williams

BennyAnthonyOfKC wrote:


Entsminger,


THE CONFEDERACY were wimps in the sense that anyone stood for what they did, GOT WHAT THEY DESERVED, and it's too bad that THE RADICAL REPUBLICANS did not get their ultimate wish, because there would have never been a reason for THE CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT simply because THE NATHAN BEDFORD FORRESTs all would have swung from gallows. By the way, what "THE REAL CONFEDERACY stood for" was always SLAVERY, because it was written into their constitution, and if it was not for guys like Glenn Beck & the historians on his shows, the tidbit that SLAVERY was mentioned in the very founding documents of THE CONFEDERACY, people could generally go on believing that they stood for STATES RIGHTS, because THE U.S. CONSTITUTION & THE UNION was no better, which is absolutely false, as the word slavery itself NEVER appeared in THE U.S. CONSTITUTION by design, until THE 13th AMENDMENT became law, thanks to REPUBLICANS, the heroes, the real heroes, that stood by blacks to end slavery.




The party of Lincoln is now the party of Palin, Beck, Gingrich and many other fruitcakes.
Open User Options Menu

BennyAnthonyOfKC

Missouri, USA



TONY WRITES:

"The party of Lincoln is now the party of Palin, Beck, Gingrich and many other fruitcakes."


BENNY ANTHONY WRITES:

That is very unkind to THE LOG CABIN REPUBLICANS! You homophobe!
Open User Options Menu

HeavyHitter32

Tony Williams wrote:



The party of Lincoln is now the party of Palin, Beck, Gingrich and many other fruitcakes.


And Barack Husein Obama and the Democrat party has proven they are true Socialists having tried to nationalize (or lead up to that) virtually every major aspect of the economy in the last year-and-a-half
Open User Options Menu

entsminger

Virginia, USA

BennyAnthonyOfKC wrote:


Entsminger,


THE CONFEDERACY were wimps in the sense that anyone stood for what they did, GOT WHAT THEY DESERVED, and it's too bad that THE RADICAL REPUBLICANS did not get their ultimate wish, because there would have never been a reason for THE CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT simply because THE NATHAN BEDFORD FORRESTs all would have swung from gallows. By the way, what "THE REAL CONFEDERACY stood for" was always SLAVERY, because it was written into their constitution, and if it was not for guys like Glenn Beck & the historians on his shows, the tidbit that SLAVERY was mentioned in the very founding documents of THE CONFEDERACY, people could generally go on believing that they stood for STATES RIGHTS, because THE U.S. CONSTITUTION & THE UNION was no better, which is absolutely false, as the word slavery itself NEVER appeared in THE U.S. CONSTITUTION by design, until THE 13th AMENDMENT became law, thanks to REPUBLICANS, the heroes, the real heroes, that stood by blacks to end slavery.




==Scott==
Sorry but the Civil War was not all about slavery,it was as much about states rights and industrial north vrs the agricultral based south. Slavery was an issue but not the main focus early on untill the politicians made it a big issue. Beck and Rush are bigoted idiots and not at all representative of the confederacy any more than they are representative of the founding fathers. Regardless of your beliefs about the Civil War the confederates who fought in the war were twice the man of todays men.
Enough of this political talk, it's making me billious.
Open User Options Menu

Tony Williams

HeavyHitter32 wrote:
Tony Williams wrote:



The party of Lincoln is now the party of Palin, Beck, Gingrich and many other fruitcakes.


And Barack Husein Obama and the Democrat party has proven they are true Socialists having tried to nationalize (or lead up to that) virtually every major aspect of the economy in the last year-and-a-half


Democratic Party ... not Democrat Party.

Barack Hussein Obama

True socialists? As opposed to what? False socialists?

And, the above is not a sentence.

If you're an American, learn English.

Tony

Open User Options Menu

HeavyHitter32

Tony Williams wrote:
HeavyHitter32 wrote:
Tony Williams wrote:



The party of Lincoln is now the party of Palin, Beck, Gingrich and many other fruitcakes.


And Barack Husein Obama and the Democrat party has proven they are true Socialists having tried to nationalize (or lead up to that) virtually every major aspect of the economy in the last year-and-a-half

Democratic Party ... not Democrat Party.

Barack Hussein Obama

True socialists? As opposed to what? False socialists?

And, the above is not a sentence.

If you're an American, learn English.

Tony



LOL

You're funny. Honestly, this is a message forum in case you didn't notice and you're writing skills are nothing to write home. Yet, all you can do is point toward a minor typo (which I see you make quite consistently by the way).


Open User Options Menu

Tony Williams

HeavyHitter32 wrote:
Tony Williams wrote:
HeavyHitter32 wrote:
Tony Williams wrote:



The party of Lincoln is now the party of Palin, Beck, Gingrich and many other fruitcakes.


And Barack Husein Obama and the Democrat party has proven they are true Socialists having tried to nationalize (or lead up to that) virtually every major aspect of the economy in the last year-and-a-half

Democratic Party ... not Democrat Party.

Barack Hussein Obama

True socialists? As opposed to what? False socialists?

And, the above is not a sentence.

If you're an American, learn English.

Tony



LOL

You're funny. Honestly, this is a message forum in case you didn't notice and you're writing skills are nothing to write home about as all I see is whiny drivel from you much of the time. Yet, all you can do is point toward a minor typo (which I see you make quite consistently by the way).




Not "you're" writing skills.

Your.

Another "typo" I guess.

What would I care what a near illiterate cares about my writing.

Hire an editor.

Tony

LOL

Open User Options Menu

Tony Williams

HeavyHitter32 wrote:
Tony Williams wrote:
HeavyHitter32 wrote:
Tony Williams wrote:



The party of Lincoln is now the party of Palin, Beck, Gingrich and many other fruitcakes.


And Barack Husein Obama and the Democrat party has proven they are true Socialists having tried to nationalize (or lead up to that) virtually every major aspect of the economy in the last year-and-a-half

Democratic Party ... not Democrat Party.

Barack Hussein Obama

True socialists? As opposed to what? False socialists?

And, the above is not a sentence.

If you're an American, learn English.

Tony



LOL

You're funny. Honestly, this is a message forum in case you didn't notice and you're writing skills are nothing to write home about as all I see is whiny drivel from you much of the time. Yet, all you can do is point toward a minor typo (which I see you make quite consistently by the way).




Four "typos". And, I would bet money you call it the "Democrat" Party all the time. Most Republicans do.

You have misspelled the president's middle name before. You simply do not know how to spell it.

Now you should.

A sentence fragment is not a typo.

English 101 ...

lol.

Tony
Open User Options Menu
1 | 2 | Next | Last
H.I.T. Acceptable Use Policy