MB Madaera
Lost 31.7 lbs fat
Built 11.7 lbs muscle


Chris Madaera
Built 9 lbs muscle


Keelan Parham
Lost 30 lbs fat
Built 4 lbs muscle


Bob Marchesello
Lost 23.55 lbs fat
Built 8.55 lbs muscle


Jeff Turner
Lost 25.5 lbs fat


Jeanenne Darden
Lost 26 lbs fat
Built 3 lbs muscle


Ted Tucker
Lost 41 lbs fat
Built 4 lbs muscle

 
 

Determine the Length of Your Workouts

Evaluate Your Progress

Keep Warm-Up in Perspective


ARCHIVES >>

"Doing more exercise with less intensity,"
Arthur Jones believes, "has all but
destroyed the actual great value
of weight training. Something
must be done . . . and quickly."
The New Bodybuilding for
Old-School Results supplies
MUCH of that "something."

 

This is one of 93 photos of Andy McCutcheon that are used in The New High-Intensity Training to illustrate the recommended exercises.

To find out more about McCutcheon and his training, click here.

 

Mission Statement

H.I.T. Acceptable Use Policy

Privacy Policy

Credits

LOG IN FORUM MAIN REGISTER SEARCH
'RenEx Will Bring the Most Impressive Results'
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next | Last
Author
Rating
Options

Joshua Trentine

Ohio, USA

interesting comment on the RenEx site

Dr.Bill November 9, 2011 at 2:37 pm [edit]

Al

A few thoughts to share, one of the reasons I believe the equipment will bring the most impressive results and beyond when nautilus first appeared, has to do with the stimulation to the nervous system. When it is exposed to exercise from a RenEx workout (compared to other methods) there is no sense of damage to the tissues, inroading is accomplished without the body going into a protective response. This will allow deeper and greater intensity.

In most attempts with other equipment a limiting factor is that the exercise creates a noxious stimulus to the nervous system which causes altered nerve synapse response and altered chemical response. This will halt further improvement. It gets more complex and I am researching this. Keep up all the good work contact me any time

Dr Bill
Open User Options Menu

natemason5

Ontario, CAN

Can we simplify that to...

1)less taxing on the CNS

2)safer?

Nate
Open User Options Menu

coomo

natemason5 wrote:
Can we simplify that to...

1)less taxing on the CNS

2)safer?

Nate


I always thought an alarm rsponse was a requirement.Or is this guy, just trying to move the goalposts?
Open User Options Menu

Joshua Trentine

Ohio, USA

natemason5 wrote:
Can we simplify that to...

1)less taxing on the CNS

2)safer?

Nate


sounds about right to me...

i've talked to bill about this i know he has much more to say but hasn't took the time to write it all out yet
Open User Options Menu

HDROB

all this renex bollocks is milking the shit out of this forum. let's change the record!
Open User Options Menu

natemason5

Ontario, CAN

Joshua Trentine wrote:
natemason5 wrote:
Can we simplify that to...

1)less taxing on the CNS

2)safer?

Nate

sounds about right to me...

i've talked to bill about this i know he has much more to say but hasn't took the time to write it all out yet


Is it the machines that make it less taxing on the CNS, or is it the application (ie. slow reps)?

Nate
Open User Options Menu

Joshua Trentine

Ohio, USA

HDROB wrote:
all this renex bollocks is milking the shit out of this forum. let's change the record!


don't open the threads.
..
post more great training videos...

btw..i've tried and even requested to drop the subject here...apparently people find it interesting...the other thread was closed due to volume at 208,000 views over 11months...some people are obviously tuning in.

i'm sorry you are sad about it
Open User Options Menu

summaHIT

Ontario, CAN

HDROB wrote:
all this renex bollocks is milking the shit out of this forum. let's change the record!


I agree.
The claims are even getting more far fetched.
Open User Options Menu

Tomislav

New York, USA

Joshua Trentine wrote:
interesting comment on the RenEx site

Dr.Bill November 9, 2011 at 2:37 pm [edit]

Al

A few thoughts to share, one of the reasons I believe the equipment will bring the most impressive results and beyond when nautilus first appeared, has to do with the stimulation to the nervous system. When it is exposed to exercise from a RenEx workout (compared to other methods) there is no sense of damage to the tissues, inroading is accomplished without the body going into a protective response. This will allow deeper and greater intensity.

In most attempts with other equipment a limiting factor is that the exercise creates a noxious stimulus to the nervous system which causes altered nerve synapse response and altered chemical response. This will halt further improvement. It gets more complex and I am researching this. Keep up all the good work contact me any time

Dr Bill


Where did Bill come up with the rationale that because he doesn't get sore the workout was more productive?

Seems to me he's not getting sore because the working sets of up to 2 1/2 minutes under load are way too long to be anaerobic.

Fred's slower SlowBurn protocol would make him sore and build muscle because the work sets all take place within the glycolytic window.
Open User Options Menu

Joshua Trentine

Ohio, USA

summaHIT wrote:
HDROB wrote:
all this renex bollocks is milking the shit out of this forum. let's change the record!

I agree.
The claims are even getting more far fetched.


:-(
Open User Options Menu

overfiftylifter

It is intriguing the idea that Renx is not "irritating" to the nervous system. If the exercises are executed in the same fashion, following the same course in what appears to be a locked position, adaption to the stimulus would seem to be acquired quickly. This easy adaption to the stimulus would require new stimuli to promote growth. From what I can see, if the protocol has a fairly set cadence, then load is the only road to this stimulus. If this is the case, I see little improvement from other existing equipment and protocols.
Open User Options Menu

entsminger

Virginia, USA

HDROB wrote:
all this renex bollocks is milking the shit out of this forum. let's change the record!


==Scott==
I've had my issues with REN-WX as others on here have but frankly it's about the only topic on here that is worth reading. I don't necessarily agree with everything that the REN-EX team expouses but at least it get's one to thinking. Most, not all, other threads on here at the moment aren't worth didly squat.
Open User Options Menu

Joshua Trentine

Ohio, USA

natemason5 wrote:
Joshua Trentine wrote:
natemason5 wrote:
Can we simplify that to...

1)less taxing on the CNS

2)safer?

Nate

sounds about right to me...

i've talked to bill about this i know he has much more to say but hasn't took the time to write it all out yet

Is it the machines that make it less taxing on the CNS, or is it the application (ie. slow reps)?

Nate



1.Equipment

2.Protocol

and a BIG one:

3.Synergy pattern
Open User Options Menu

Joshua Trentine

Ohio, USA

entsminger wrote:
HDROB wrote:
all this renex bollocks is milking the shit out of this forum. let's change the record!

==Scott==
I've had my issues with REN-WX as others on here have but frankly it's about the only topic on here that is worth reading. I don't necessarily agree with everything that the REN-EX team expouses but at least it get's one to thinking. Most, not all, other threads on here at the moment aren't worth didly squat.


I know this will come across cocky but there is nothing going-on on this board otherwise...i will say this--- it's not a discussion board by any stretch...no one here discusses anything...post something thought out and all you ever get is whining before the points are even explored in any detail.

it's a waste and appears beyond repair...i'm sitting in my office waiting for the workers to install some carpet so i can precisely level my machines...i know, i know...that doesn't matter either.lol

anyway, if i weren't sitting here i wouldn't even be wasting my time.
Open User Options Menu

Joshua Trentine

Ohio, USA

summaHIT wrote:
HDROB wrote:
all this renex bollocks is milking the shit out of this forum. let's change the record!

I agree.
The claims are even getting more far fetched.


GO AHEAD....Take the lead, what would you like to discuss?
Open User Options Menu

J-son

summaHIT wrote:
HDROB wrote:
all this renex bollocks is milking the shit out of this forum. let's change the record!

I agree.
The claims are even getting more far fetched.


I disagree with you two. A lot more interesting then "whats best - leg press or squat" kind of discussions or some fat guy training in a video, IMO.

Each to his own, if you don't like it, why comment here?

//jonas
Open User Options Menu

J-son

entsminger wrote:
HDROB wrote:
all this renex bollocks is milking the shit out of this forum. let's change the record!

==Scott==
I've had my issues with REN-WX as others on here have but frankly it's about the only topic on here that is worth reading. I don't necessarily agree with everything that the REN-EX team expouses but at least it get's one to thinking. Most, not all, other threads on here at the moment aren't worth didly squat.


+1
Open User Options Menu

sgb2112

Yes, we need more threads about studies of HVT being best and guys who just lift.
Open User Options Menu

Joshua Trentine

Ohio, USA

J-son wrote:
summaHIT wrote:
HDROB wrote:
all this renex bollocks is milking the shit out of this forum. let's change the record!

I agree.
The claims are even getting more far fetched.

I disagree with you two. A lot more interesting then "whats best - leg press or squat" kind of discussions or some fat guy training in a video, IMO.

Each to his own, if you don't like it, why comment here?

//jonas



"Each to his own, if you don't like it, why comment here?"

the only way you are taking the energy to post ANYWHERE is because you ARE interested or you are threatened.

what these geniuses fail to realize is everytime they post the thread goes back to the top and MORE people read it.

the BEST promoter of RenEx....hands down...Turpin
Open User Options Menu

summaHIT

Ontario, CAN

Joshua Trentine wrote:
summaHIT wrote:
HDROB wrote:
all this renex bollocks is milking the shit out of this forum. let's change the record!

I agree.
The claims are even getting more far fetched.

GO AHEAD....Take the lead, what would you like to discuss?


Well, you can first explain why in your last movie Magneto and Professor Xavier addressed Logan/Wolverine by a different name in the bar scene?

Second, can you also explain to me why you have fixed the motion and do not have independent arms for your equipment?
It seems to me having something freer like these "functional trainers" makes more sense.
Open User Options Menu

entsminger

Virginia, USA

Joshua Trentine wrote:
entsminger wrote:
HDROB wrote:
all this renex bollocks is milking the shit out of this forum. let's change the record!

==Scott==
I've had my issues with REN-WX as others on here have but frankly it's about the only topic on here that is worth reading. I don't necessarily agree with everything that the REN-EX team expouses but at least it get's one to thinking. Most, not all, other threads on here at the moment aren't worth didly squat.

I know this will come across cocky but there is nothing going-on on this board otherwise...i will say this--- it's not a discussion board by any stretch...no one here discusses anything...post something thought out and all you ever get is whining before the points are even explored in any detail.

it's a waste and appears beyond repair...i'm sitting in my office waiting for the workers to install some carpet so i can precisely level my machines...i know, i know...that doesn't matter either.lol

anyway, if i weren't sitting here i wouldn't even be wasting my time.


==Scott==
It's become a...here's my way of doing things and if you don't agree with me you're an idiot forum. Very few on here can ever admit that maybe someone else's way might be better .It's my way or the highway.That get's old real fast..
When this REN-EX stuff first came out I was convinced that most all of it was pure crap. I kept asking seemingly dumb questions and had my share of fights with Joshua but finally began to think that maybe there really is something to this REN-EX stuff. I'm still not convinced that their method will produce better results than most other methods but there is something useful to be learned from what they have to say.The only way to find out for sure is to keep asking questions and actually try their machines.
Open User Options Menu

Joshua Trentine

Ohio, USA

summaHIT wrote:
Joshua Trentine wrote:
summaHIT wrote:
HDROB wrote:
all this renex bollocks is milking the shit out of this forum. let's change the record!

I agree.
The claims are even getting more far fetched.

GO AHEAD....Take the lead, what would you like to discuss?

Well, you can first explain why in your last movie Magneto and Dr. Xavier addressed Logan/Wolverine by a different name in the bar scene?

Second, can you also explain to me why you have fixed the motion and do not have independent arms for your equipment?
It seems to me having something freer like these "functional trainers" makes more sense.



whew ya...stick to those functional trainers.

i'll put an article up about equipment design principles if you like
Open User Options Menu

HDROB

i visit this forum and its renex this, renex that. i might write to d.darden and ask him to change the name of this forum to 'joshua'. can someone else get a sniff?
Open User Options Menu

HDROB

in fact, let's all give the omniscient one a round of applause; a pat on the back; buy him a cup of coffee. this will make a change from him blowing is own trumpet.
Open User Options Menu

Turpin

HDROB wrote:
in fact, let's all the omniscient one a round of applause; a pat on the back; buy him a cup of coffee. this will make a change from him blowing is own trumpet.


Rob , you had better watch out or Psycho Jonas , `Jittery`Edward and `Twiggy` Shortt will be onto you in a flash for insulting their idol.

T.
Open User Options Menu
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next | Last
H.I.T. Acceptable Use Policy